Delegation — Agent Orchestration & Parallelization
What It Does
Parallelizes work across six patterns: built-in agents, worktree-isolated agents, background agents, custom agents via ComposeAgent, agent teams via TeamCreate, and parallel task dispatch. It also splits delegation into two weights — lightweight one-shot workers (haiku, capped turns) versus full agents that iterate with tools. The Algorithm auto-invokes it once work hits three or more independent workstreams.
The Problem
Doing independent work serially wastes time, but throwing every task at a heavyweight agent wastes more — spawning a full agent for a one-shot classification burns 10-30 seconds of startup for nothing. Worse, people conflate two different systems: fire-and-forget custom agents with no shared state, and persistent agent teams that message each other and share a task list. Pick the wrong one and you either over-coordinate simple work or under-coordinate complex work. This skill routes each job to the right pattern and the right weight.
How It Works
Auto-invoked by the Algorithm when work can be parallelized or requires agent specialization.
🚨 CRITICAL ROUTING — Two COMPLETELY Different Systems
| the user Says | System | Tool | What Happens |
|---|
| "custom agents", "specialized agents", "spin up agents", "launch agents" | Agents Skill (ComposeAgent) | Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt=<ComposeAgent output>) | Unique personalities, voices, colors via trait composition |
| "create an agent team", "agent team", "swarm" | Claude Code Teams | TeamCreate → TaskCreate → SendMessage | Persistent team with shared task list, message coordination, multi-turn collaboration |
These are NOT the same thing:
- Custom agents = one-shot parallel workers with unique identities, launched via
Task(), no shared state
- Agent teams = persistent coordinated teams with shared task lists, messaging, and multi-turn collaboration via
TeamCreate
When the Algorithm Should Use This Skill
- 3+ independent workstreams exist at Extended+ effort level
- Multiple identical non-serial tasks need parallel execution
- Specialized expertise needed (architecture design, implementation, ISC optimization)
- Large codebase changes spanning 5+ files benefit from parallel workers
- Research + execution can proceed simultaneously
- "Create an agent team" — use TeamCreate for persistent coordinated teams
- Unattended autonomous work where auditability matters more than speed — spawn an Observer team (Agents skill → SPAWNOBSERVERS) alongside the primary agent, reading the tool-activity audit log, voting continue/halt/escalate. ONLY use when BOTH (a) time is not a constraint and (b) auditability is the primary requirement. Never for interactive or time-sensitive work. See Agents/SKILL.md "Observer Team Archetype" for shape and guardrails.
Delegation Patterns
1. Built-In Agents
⚠️ Built-in agents are for internal workflow routing ONLY. When the user asks for custom, specialized, or uniquely-voiced agents, use the Agents skill (section 4 below) instead.
Use Task(subagent_type="AgentType") with these specialized agents:
| Agent Type | Specialization | When to Use |
|---|
general-purpose (+ role brief) | Code, architecture, design work | Add a senior-engineer/TDD or system-design brief in the prompt — the Engineer/Architect types were retired |
Algorithm | ISC optimization, criteria work | ISC-specialized verification |
Explore | Fast codebase search | Quick file/pattern discovery |
Plan | Implementation strategy | Design before execution |
Always include: Full context, effort budget, expected output format.
2. Worktree-Isolated Agents
Run agents in their own git worktree with isolation: "worktree" for file-safe parallelism:
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", isolation: "worktree", prompt="Senior engineer, TDD. ...")
- Each agent gets its own working tree — no file conflicts with other agents
- Worktree auto-created on spawn, auto-cleaned when agent finishes (unless changes made)
- Use when multiple agents edit the same files or for competing approaches
- Can combine with
run_in_background: true for non-blocking isolated work
- Built-in agents with
isolation: worktree in frontmatter auto-isolate on every spawn
3. Background Agents
Run agents with run_in_background: true for non-blocking parallel work:
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", run_in_background: true, prompt="Senior engineer, TDD. ...")
- Use when results aren't needed immediately
- Check output with
Read tool on the output_file path
- Ideal for: research, long builds, parallel investigations
3b. Foreground Agents (the default — contrast to pattern 3, not a seventh pattern)
Standard Task() calls that block until complete:
- Use when you need the result before proceeding
- Use for sequential dependencies
- Default mode — most common
4. Custom Agents (via Agents Skill)
Trigger: "custom agents", "spin up agents", "launch agents", "specialized agents"
Action: Invoke the Agents skill → run ComposeAgent.ts → launch with Task(subagent_type="general-purpose")
# Step 1: Compose agent identity
bun run ~/.claude/skills/Agents/Tools/ComposeAgent.ts --traits "security,skeptical,thorough" --task "Review auth" --output json
# Step 2: Launch with composed prompt
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt=<ComposeAgent JSON .prompt field>)
- Each agent gets unique personality, voice, and color via ComposeAgent
- Use DIFFERENT trait combinations for each agent to get unique voices
- Never use built-in agent types for custom work — compose via the Agents skill
- Ideal for: domain experts, adversarial reviewers, creative brainstormers, parallel analysis
5. Agent Teams (via TeamCreate)
Trigger: "create an agent team", "agent team", "swarm", "team of agents"
Action: Use TeamCreate tool → TaskCreate → spawn teammates via Task(team_name=...) → coordinate via SendMessage
1. TeamCreate(team_name="my-project") # Creates team + task list
2. TaskCreate(subject="Implement auth module") # Create team tasks
3. Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", team_name="my-project", name="auth-engineer") # Spawn teammate (senior-engineer/TDD brief in prompt)
4. TaskUpdate(taskId="1", owner="auth-engineer") # Assign task
5. SendMessage(type="message", recipient="auth-engineer", content="...") # Coordinate
This is a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT system from custom agents:
- Custom agents (Agents skill) = fire-and-forget parallel workers, no shared state
- Agent teams (TeamCreate) = persistent coordinated teams with shared task lists, messaging, multi-turn
Team Guidelines:
- Use for 3+ independently workable criteria at Extended+
- Large complex coding tasks benefit most
- Each teammate works independently on assigned tasks via shared task list
- Parent coordinates via
SendMessage, reconciles results
- Teammates go idle between turns — send messages to wake them
When to Use Teams vs Subagents (Decision Matrix)
| Factor | Subagents (Task) | Agent Teams (TeamCreate) |
|---|
| Communication | Fire-and-forget, no peer messaging | Persistent messaging between teammates |
| Context | Fresh context each spawn, limited window | Full context window per teammate, preserved across turns |
| Coordination | Parent collects results, no shared state | Shared task list, direct peer DMs, idle/wake cycle |
| Duration | Single-turn execution | Multi-turn, iterative work with course corrections |
| Overhead | Low — spawn and forget | Higher — team setup, task creation, message routing |
| Best for | Parallel research, one-shot analysis, simple delegation | Complex multi-file changes, iterative debugging, cross-layer coordination |
Decision rule: If agents need to talk to each other or iterate on shared work → Teams. If each agent does independent one-shot work → Subagents.
Concrete examples:
- "Research 4 topics in parallel" → Subagents (independent, no coordination needed)
- "Build a feature spanning API + UI + tests with shared state" → Teams (cross-layer, needs coordination)
- "Run 10 file updates with same pattern" → Subagents (parallel, identical, independent)
- "Debug a complex issue with competing hypotheses" → Teams (need to share findings, adjust approach)
6. Parallel Task Dispatch
For N identical operations (e.g., updating 10 files with the same pattern):
- Create N
Task() calls in a single message (parallel launch)
- Each agent gets one unit of work
- Results collected when all complete
Effort-Level Scaling
| Effort | Delegation Strategy |
|---|
| Instant/Fast | No delegation — direct tools only |
| Standard | 1-2 foreground agents max for discrete subtasks |
| Extended | 2-4 agents, background agents for research |
| Advanced | 4-8 agents, agent teams for 3+ workstreams |
| Deep | Full team orchestration, parallel workers |
| Comprehensive | Unbounded — teams + parallel + background |
Two-Tier Delegation (Lightweight vs Full)
Not all delegation needs a full agent. Match delegation weight to task complexity:
Lightweight Delegation
For: One-shot extraction, classification, summarization, simple Q&A against provided content.
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku", max_turns=3, prompt="...")
- Use
model="haiku" for cost/speed efficiency
- Set
max_turns=3 — if it can't finish in 3 turns, it needs full delegation
- Provide all input inline in the prompt (no tool use expected)
- Examples: "Classify this text as X/Y/Z", "Extract the 5 key points from this", "Summarize this in 2 sentences"
Full Delegation
For: Multi-step reasoning, tasks requiring tool use (file reads, searches, web), tasks that need their own iteration loop.
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt="...") # or specialized agent type
- Default model (sonnet/opus inherited from parent)
- No max_turns restriction — agent iterates until done
- Agent uses tools autonomously (Read, Grep, Bash, etc.)
- Examples: "Research X and produce a report", "Refactor these 5 files", "Debug why test Y fails"
Decision Rule
Ask: "Can this be answered in one LLM call with no tool use?" → Lightweight. Otherwise → Full.
| Signal | Tier |
|---|
| Input fits in prompt, output is extraction/classification | Lightweight |
| Needs to read files, search, or browse | Full |
| Needs iteration or self-correction | Full |
| Simple transform of provided content | Lightweight |
| Requires domain expertise + research | Full |
Why this matters: Spawning a full agent for a one-shot extraction wastes ~10-30s of startup overhead and unnecessary context. Lightweight delegation returns in 2-5s. Over an Extended+ Algorithm run with 10+ delegations, this saves minutes. Inspired by RLM's llm_query() vs rlm_query() two-tier pattern (Zhang/Kraska/Khattab 2025).
Right-Sizing Pre-Gate (PLAN, all tiers)
The tier delegation floors set a minimum fan-out. This gate sets the ceiling and the proof you owe. Run it before any fan-out. It exists because over-delegation is one of the most expensive recurring wastes in the reflection log: teams spawned for single-file rewrites, a writing agent that reported "completed" with zero disk writes (110k tokens spent for nothing), 300-agent waves with no headroom left to verify them. The outside proof is Cloudflare's risk-tiered dispatch — scale the agent count to the size of the job. Don't send the dream team to review a typo fix.
- (a) Zero-agent check. Is the answer already in working memory, or reachable by
Glob+Grep+Read in under 30s, or isolated to a single file? Then 0 agents — do it inline. A subagent isn't free; its setup, context load, and result handling cost more than a direct read.
- (b) Disk-effect probe on every writing agent. An agent that says it wrote or edited files isn't trusted until you confirm it: the file exists AND the diff is non-empty (
Read / git diff / Grep the claimed change). A "completed" report is a claim, not evidence. Rule 1 Live-Probe binds delegates exactly as it binds the primary.
- (c) Budget reservation above ~8 agents. A fan-out past ~8 concurrent agents must reserve explicit verification budget — you can't spend it all generating and none confirming — and name a non-agent fallback branch in
## Decisions for when the wave comes back unusable. This bounds the 5-level nesting capability: nesting multiplies agent count, so the ceiling is on the whole tree, not just the top layer.
Output at the Delegation Gate: 📐 RIGHT-SIZE: [0-agent inline | N agents, disk-probed | N>8, verify-budget reserved + fallback named].
Anti-Patterns (Don't Do These)
- Don't delegate what Grep/Glob/Read can do in <2 seconds
- Don't spawn agents for single-file changes
- Don't create teams for fewer than 3 independent workstreams
- Don't send agents work without full context — they start fresh
- Don't use built-in agent names for custom agents
- Don't use built-in agent types when user asks for specialized or custom agents — always use ComposeAgent via the Agents skill
- Don't use full delegation for one-shot extraction/classification — use lightweight tier
Gotchas
- Delegation uses Claude Code's built-in TeamCreate — NOT the Agents skill's ComposeAgent. These are different systems.
- 3+ independent workstreams warrant delegation. For 1-2 tasks, direct work is faster than team coordination overhead.
- Agent teams share a task list. Use TaskCreate/TaskUpdate for coordination, not ad-hoc messages.
- Teams overkill for single-file tasks. (Mar 2026 reflection: "one agent that can both read code and write JSX is better than three specialists who can't coordinate")
- Forked subagents inherit the full main-thread conversation + share its prompt cache (Anthropic CC v2.1.133+, enabled via
CLAUDE_CODE_FORK_SUBAGENT=1 env or agent frontmatter context: fork). Use forked subagents for nuance-dependent work: design variations, follow-on research, anything that depends on context the main thread already established. DO NOT FORK for code review — a forked reviewer defends its own code (R Amjad: "biased toward defending own code"). For convergence questions, run one fork + one non-fork in parallel and look at where they disagree.
Examples
Example 1: Parallel implementation
User: "build the frontend and backend in parallel"
→ Creates team via TeamCreate
→ Spawns frontend and backend agents
→ Shared task list for coordination
→ Agents work independently, merge results
Example 2: Research swarm
User: "launch an agent team to research these 5 topics"
→ Creates team with 5 research agents
→ Each agent handles one topic independently
→ Results synthesized by team lead
Execution Log
After completing any workflow, append a single JSONL entry:
echo '{"ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","skill":"Delegation","workflow":"WORKFLOW_USED","input":"8_WORD_SUMMARY","status":"ok|error","duration_s":SECONDS}' >> ~/.claude/LIFEOS/MEMORY/SKILLS/execution.jsonl
Replace WORKFLOW_USED with the workflow executed, 8_WORD_SUMMARY with a brief input description, and SECONDS with approximate wall-clock time. Log status: "error" if the workflow failed.