# How we monitor for compliance drift

A daily sweep checks resources against policy for public buckets, untagged resources, and over-broad roles, files findings, and proposes remediation as a reviewed change rather than applying it.

Canonical page: https://kortix.com/use-cases/compliance-monitoring

Infrastructure drifts out of compliance quietly. A bucket gets made public for a
one-off, a resource ships without its tags, a role picks up a permission it no
longer needs. Each change is small and reasonable in the moment, but they
accumulate, and nobody notices until an audit or an incident surfaces them all at
once. By then reconstructing when each drift happened is hard.

We handle this by checking the infrastructure against policy every day, so drift
surfaces the day it appears. This writes up how we run that on Kortix — the
connections, the steps, and the guardrails — so you can set up the same sweep.

- **Team:** Kortix
- **Trigger:** A daily scheduled sweep
- **Connected systems:** AWS · Audit logs · Slack
- **Mode:** Cron-driven · Review-gated

## The problem

The common approaches each have limits. A quarterly manual audit finds drift late
and in bulk, when the context is hardest to recover. A fixed rules engine catches
the checks it was configured for and nothing beyond them. And auto-remediation
that fixes drift on its own can break a service that depended on the very
configuration it "corrected."

We wanted the infrastructure checked against policy daily, with findings filed
where the team already works and fixes proposed as reviewed changes rather than
applied silently.

## What we built

On Kortix, a daily schedule triggers an agent. Each sweep runs in its own
isolated session — a cloud sandbox — with scoped, read access to AWS and the
audit logs. The agent checks resources against policy — public buckets, untagged
resources, over-broad roles — and files what it finds to Slack. Remediation is
proposed as a reviewed change, never applied automatically.

## How it works

### Connect the schedule as the trigger

A **cron** trigger runs the sweep once a day. Each run spawns a fresh **session**
in its own sandbox. One sweep, one session, one disposable machine. Nothing
carries over between runs, so each day's check starts clean.

### Give the agent the compliance policy

What counts as a violation — which buckets may be public, which tags are
required, what a role should and shouldn't hold — is stored as **skills** and
**memory** that load into every session. The agent checks against that policy
rather than a fixed rule set, and it updates as the policy changes.

### Connect what the sweep can read

Through scoped **connectors**, brokered server-side so no raw token reaches the
model, the agent can:

- **Read AWS resource state** — bucket policies, resource tags, and IAM roles.
- **Read the audit logs** — when a configuration changed and what changed it.
- **Post to Slack** — findings filed to the channel the team watches.

### Set the guardrails

The sweep's access to AWS is **read-only** — it inspects state, it doesn't change
it. Remediation is proposed as a reviewed **change request** and stops at a
**human approval gate**; nothing is applied automatically. Credentials are
encrypted in the secrets manager and injected at runtime, scoped to the agents you grant them to.

### Let each day surface the drift

With that in place, the daily sweep checks the infrastructure against policy,
files what drifted to Slack, and attaches a proposed fix for a person to review.
A newly public bucket becomes a finding and a draft policy change. An untagged
resource becomes a flag and a proposed tag set. An over-broad role becomes a
narrower policy held for review.

> **The pattern**
> Run the sweep on a **cron** trigger, give the agent scoped read **connectors**
> into AWS and the audit logs, encode the compliance policy as **skills** and
> **memory**, and propose every fix as a reviewed **change request** rather than
> applying it.

## Guardrails

Giving an agent a standing view of the infrastructure is a trust question. The
relevant controls on Kortix:

- **Isolation.** Every sweep runs in its own isolated sandbox on its own branch.
  The session is granted access only to what it's scoped to read, and only the findings it
  files are written back out.
- **Scoped secrets.** Each credential is encrypted in the secrets manager,
  injected into the sandbox at runtime, and scoped to the agents you grant them to or the
  logs.
- **Human approval gate.** Remediation is proposed, never auto-applied; a person
  reviews and applies each change.
- **Everything is code.** The agent's persona, skills, and permissions are files
  in the repo — versioned and changed through a reviewed **change request**, not
  a dashboard setting.

## The outcome

- **Daily:** Infrastructure re-checked against policy every day
- **Same-day:** Drift caught before it accumulates for an audit
- **Review-gated:** Every fix proposed as a change, never auto-applied

The drift that used to surface in bulk at audit time now arrives as small daily
findings in Slack, each with a proposed fix a person reviews before it's applied.
The team reviews a change instead of reconstructing months of drift, and the
infrastructure stays close to policy.